雷竞技手机版robert lyman贡献©2020

在一个上一篇文章,我总结了一个组织的发现卡尔led the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) concerning the global public and private sector expenditures on climate-related measures. In brief, total expenditures over the 2011 to 2018 period were US $3.66 trillion, 55% of which were on solar and wind energy. The CPI reports extensively on other topics related to climate finance, and is obviously very well-funded itself. Although it does not publish online its budget or annual report, it lists a large number of well-heeled donors, including Bloomberg Philanthropies, Climate Work Foundation, Green Climate Fund, International Development Finance Club, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Oak Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and the World Wildlife Fund. Its most recent report, entitled Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2019, provides even more information that is worthy of comment.

This is why children should not be setting public policy – they are not informedhttps://www.bbc.com/news/av/science-environment-50743083

The report notes that the “tracked” climate finance in 2017 and 2018 crossed the US dollar half- trillion mark for the first time. Annual flows rose to US$ 579 billion on average over the two-year period. A quarter of the increase over previous periods was due to the incorporation of new sources of funding, including private investments on “sustainable infrastructure” and the use of proceeds of bonds issued by the private sector and regional and municipal governments.

Average annual public sector finance totaled US$ 253 billion in 2017/2018, representing 44% of total commitments that year. Private finance, which reached US$ 326 billion on average annually in 2017-2018, accounted for the majority of climate finance, at around 56%. Most of the financing was in the form of market-rate debt, averaging $US $316 billion annually.

Based on the information currently available to the Climate Policy Initiative organization,2019 climate finance flows will amount to US$ 608 billion- $622 billion, a 6% to 8% increase over the 2017-2018 averages.

有人可能认为这将被气候支出的支持者作为成功欢迎。相反,它被描述为几乎足够。Climate Policy Initiative, driven by the mandate of attaining the IPCC’s goal of avoiding an increase in global average temperatures to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius over those that prevailed in pre-industrial times, estimates the range of necessary spending to be between US $1.7 trillion and $3.9 trillion per year, three to seven times as much as the 2017-2018 average. At those levels of expenditure, over the 30-year period 2021 to 2050, the global cost of climate spending would be between US $51 trillion and US $117 trillion. It is difficult to imagine how much that is.US $117 trillion is US $10.7 billion per day, or U.S. $446 million per hour, for 30 years.

当其他人说气候变化政策措施不会花费时,这可能是一个有用的数字。

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/greta-thunberg-at-davos-you-have-done-nothing-on-climate-change/articleshow/73506242.cms

About the Author

Robert Lyman是一名经济学家,拥有27年的经济体,作为加拿大联邦政府的分析师,政策顾问和经理,主要是在能源,运输和环境政策领域。他也是一个10年的外交官。随后,他作为私人顾问进行了私人顾问,为能源和运输问题进行了政策研究和分析,作为进驻委托政策研究小组的校长。他是科学友情的文章和报告的常见贡献者,基于卡尔加里的独立组织有关与气候变化有关的问题。他居住在加拿大渥太华。L竞技