通过米歇尔斯特林©2020

In Don Braid’s recentop-ed攻击加拿大能源中心那commonly known as the ‘War Room’ he seems willfully blind to the焦油沙滩竞选against Alberta以及对我们国际声誉和经济的损害。似乎他也不关心,因为他呼吁战争空间被关闭,因为审计师将军所说的一些邋and的会计措施,但纠正。

唐似乎没有人可以弄脏加拿大能源中心。他似乎并不介意你不能摇晃/ maithway,这使得更多的纳税人的钱作为联邦登记的慈善机构而不是加拿大能源中心。通过潮汐网络和朋友的网络网络,加拿大的艾伯塔省和基础设施的数十亿美元blocked through its role in the Tar Sands Campaign

Based on public records from 2000 to 2018, TIDES/MakeWay received revenues that were more than the combined revenues of Canada’s two largest federal political parties, the Liberal Party of Canada and the Conservative Party of Canada.

//www.eugenelab.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/money-matters-report-format-final.pdf.


Environmental Defence, one of the loudest detractors of the Alberta oil sands, received some $9,348,308 from the US Joyce Foundation. In fact, from 2000-2018 the top 40 ENGOs (most of which are tax subsidized charities) received some118亿美元的收入,很多来自外国实体。

https://blog.friendsofscence.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/big-green-money-no-vs-pro-final-revb-feb-12-2019-2.pdf.

艾伯塔省trying to fight back with facts and a miniscule budget is facing an uphill battle. Certainly, it did not help that the War Room tripped itself up with many amateurish人造Pas.- 但逃离机构没有与世界上最大的广告机构之一或其与主要国际媒体的直接联系或数十亿美元相连的焦油沙子竞选战略家的利益。以及加拿大联邦政府主流媒体记者的讽刺意味着,因为他们是由艾伯塔省政府支付的。他们是否曾举行过手指以客观地报告艾伯塔省,并检查焦油沙滩竞选EngoS的索赔吗?不,因为他们中的大多数是climate crazed Stockholm Syndrome mental hostages to the Tar Sands Campaign psyop

多么具有讽刺意味Toronto Star据报道,加拿大记者协会抗议战争室的“记者”这个词的使用Toronto Star partnered with TIDES/Make Way for six months of Orwellian pro-Parisand防油砂reporting in the lead up to the COP21 confab which resulted in the Paris Agreement. Also laughable asmost Canadian journalists are government funded。要求可再生能源将取代石油,天然气和煤炭是贫困新闻的例子,特别是you can’t make any renewables without fossil fuels.

艾伯塔省的石油砂被用作美国政治的楔形问题,超过2年,绿亿万富翁融资各种抗议性抗议ad campaigns。Greenpeace and WWF have been funded to mobilize their people to attack politicians, banks, and insurance companies for any oil sands engagement. Greenpeace and WWF activists have also beenlead authors of IPCC climate change reports顺便问一下。

https://blog.friendsofscence.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/manufacturing-a-climation-crisis-2a-final.pdf.

Back at home, for many years, blind to the strategized Tar Sands Campaign, Alberta naively tried stakeholder sessions, putting radicals like Tzeporah Berman (whoChatelaine labelled“石油工业的头号敌人”March 15, 2019) on the board of industry-ENGO-citizen groups, trying to make peace and create a rational dialogue on climate and energy policies. Until the work ofVivian Krause.达到公众,艾伯塔坦从未意识到焦油沙沙竞选背后有数十亿美元的努力和数百个国际集团。

The main goal of several of the green crony capitalist backers of the Tar Sands Campaign, it seems, was commercial. Several are associated with the ClimateWorks “Design to Win“计划”,绿色慈善学家希望在全球范围内建立碳,全球帽和贸易立法的价格,并将可再生能源(风和太阳能)放在全球范围内(因为这些产生了可交易碳信用额)。他们为当地的Engos提供资助他们想要的政策,从而创造基层需求的幻觉,避免在政策中避免省级或国家主权问题。一旦油砂瞄准,妖魔化化石燃料就会变得轻松。露天矿矿山是一个完美的“肮脏”视觉,与“干净的绿色”力量相比,结果是相当无用的,不可靠,昂贵。感知是现实。在这个得分,无论艾伯塔省的恒星环境和工业纪录的事实,艾伯塔都迷失了。

//www.eugenelab.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/design_to_win_final_8_31_07.pdf

焦油砂竞争错误地声称二氧化碳(二氧化碳)排放有害,并导致全球温度危险。这是基于气候模型[计算机模拟],与温度数据相比,将CO2的气候敏感(变暖效果)夸大了两倍。Roger Pielke,Jr。透露,讨厌油砂和Keystone XL的同样的绿色亿万富翁,传播了“风险业务”- 一个报告,使用最极端和不切实际的气候模型称为RCP 8.5,以绘制一个可怕的气候科幻图片。

实际上,经济分析表明,二氧化碳排放对农业的益处(通过变暖和二氧化碳施肥)可能比预期的二氧化碳联合损害损害大约80倍,风暴,飓风和海平面上升。迄今为止,没有证据表明海拔地区的极端天气事件或加速度。

谁知道加拿大人会形成斯特拉斯梅雷集团so that the top 14 ENGOs could meet and strategize their next coordinated move… against Alberta?FOIP that, Don。与此同时,艾伯塔省环境的沟通部(我曾经担任过公开询问的信息协调员)天真地继续发出解释性小册子,网站和信息小册子关于油砂的事实。

没有人想要事实。甚至没有!高级动员的气候变化Engo Grounies希望成为凯瑟琳麦克纳的超级英雄,如凯瑟琳麦肯纳在她的绿色海角和面具中,或者挑衅的知识 - 所有的叛乱分子就像高中辍学Greta Thunberg一样。

奇怪的是,Greta去年访问蒙特利尔的安全细节是由David Suzuki基金会的资助,通过猪蹄基金会。和好奇地,格雷塔被一群人支持carbon offset promoters。How is that charitable activity? In fact, ‘climate change’ as a cause does not even meet the Canada Revenue Agency mandate of ‘local, tangible, measurable’.

https://www.trottierfoundation.com/2019-grants

Don. No questions??

当然,当一个人看着卡尔加里的顽固的市中心和艾伯塔省的失业数字时,焦油砂耳鸣的活动都没有达到CRA的“慈善”的净公共利益的考验。

The “benefit” aspect of the test concerns whether the charitable purpose under consideration is directed towards实现对公众无害的普遍良好- 社会有用的努力。https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/cholities/policies-guidance/policy-statement-024-guidelines-registering-a-charity-meeting-public-benefit -test。html#toc3.

所以,唐认为艾伯塔应该放弃没有战斗,只是因为战争房间在第一年的一年内弄乱了。

The lives of hundreds of thousands of Albertans have been ruined by the Tar Sands Campaign. I am a Calgarian. I will keep fighting back, even if Don Braid will not.

~~~~

注意:正如这已发布,加拿大能源中心发出了一个新的资金t: “$672 billion: The energy sector’s revenues to Canadian governments 2000–2018 – Canada’s oil and gas sector alone contributed $493 billion to federal, provincial and municipal governments”。找不到几百万美元,了解谁正在摧毁这个行业并阻止访问世界市场,唐?

米歇尔斯特林

米歇尔斯特林is the Communications Manager for Friends of Science Society, a member of the Canadian Association of Journalists, and AAAS

Disclosure:

科学学会的朋友是一名志愿者运行的非营利社会,由会员/订阅者提供资金。平均捐款不到500美元。我们不代表任何行业,没有政府合同或资金。我们与Vivian Krause没有关系。除了在这篇文章中的一篇新闻报道中的单一参考之外,我们通过从公共记录的研究独立地收集了对Engo资助和资产的报告。